{"id":23187,"date":"2020-11-07T07:53:03","date_gmt":"2020-11-07T15:53:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/?post_type=section&p=23187"},"modified":"2024-09-09T12:48:22","modified_gmt":"2024-09-09T11:48:22","slug":"post-structuralist-deconstructive-criticism","status":"publish","type":"section","link":"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/section\/research\/research-methods\/textual-methods\/literary-criticism\/post-structuralist-deconstructive-criticism\/","title":{"rendered":"Post-Structuralist, Deconstructive Criticism"},"content":{"rendered":"
Post-Structuralist, Deconstructive Criticism<\/em> is <\/p>\n\n\n\n Key Terms: Dialectic<\/a>; Hermeneutics<\/a>; Semiotics<\/a>; Text & Intertextuality<\/a>; Tone<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Post-Structuralist Criticism, Deconstructive criticism<\/em> also explores patterns within texts, but deconstructive criticism aims to demonstrate how conflicting forces within the text undermine the stability of the text\u2019s structure, revealing meaning as an array of undetermined possibilities. Deconstructive criticism may also focus on binaries in a text, such as good\/evil, light\/dark, male\/female, poor\/rich, linear\/nonlinear, old\/young, masculine\/feminine, or natural\/artificial, to expose one aspect of the binary as privileged and the other as suppressed. The discussion of deconstructionist criticism below will focus on the light\/dark binary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Jacques Derrida is the originator of deconstruction. As M.H. Abrams points out in A Glossary of Literary Terms<\/em>, however, Derrida did not intend for deconstruction to serve as a method for writing literary criticism. Rather, Derrida viewed deconstruction as a technique for exposing and subverting many assumptions of Western thought in a variety of texts (59). Additionally, Paul de Man, Barbara Johnson, and J.H. Miller have all been instrumental in the development of deconstructive readings of literary texts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Deconstruction is a type of theory that arose from post-structuralism, which asserts that since systems are always changing, it is impossible to describe a complete system, such as one that insists on the association of darkness with evil and vice versa. As such, post-structuralists also view subjects\u2014subjects such as readers\u2014as caught up in the forces that produce the very structures they study as objects of knowledge. Discovering Truth with a capital T is, therefore, an impossible task to carry out with deconstructive criticism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For example, a deconstructionist critic would ask how and why more importance is placed on light versus dark in a text, thereby questioning the truth of these associations within\u2014and even outside of\u2014the literary text. For example, if a reader can see how a literary text intentionally correlates light with goodness and darkness with evil, a reader might begin to question the truth of these correlations. Similarly, a deconstructionist critic would point out how the construction of these contrasting forces undermine their stability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Consider Joyce Carol Oates\u2019s short story \u201cWhere Are you Going, Where Have You Been?\u201d After initially reading the story, many readers associate darkness with the dangerous character, Arnold, and light with the innocent victim, Connie. And yet some astute readers have noticed the pale (light) skin that surrounds Arnold\u2019s dark eyes. If Arnold represents evil, why are his dark eyes surrounded with pale light? Additionally, Connie attempts to get a tan in the natural sunlight, while Arnold puts on makeup to make himself appear tan. A meaningful difference between light and dark in the text is undermined by Arnold\u2019s ability to simply paint on the type of tan that Connie strives to acquire. How can light represent goodness if a bad person can simply make himself appear light\u2014or tan\u2014like Connie is? The deconstructionist critic recognizes how the text plays around with the assumptions readers make based on the connotations of the words and the images they create, enhancing the tension in the story, and undermining the possibility of the text creating only one meaning. For example, Connie lives in a suburb where everyone notices that Arnold doesn\u2019t fit in, but no one confronts him. Connie\u2019s friends and neighbors silently consent to Arnold\u2019s presence, leading to his eventual abduction of Connie. Oates\u2019s story invites us to consider that her story can be interpreted in multiple ways.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Online Example: A Deconstructive Reading of George Crumb’s Black Angels<\/p>\n\n\n\n Discussion Questions and Activities: Deconstructive and Post-Structuralist Criticism<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Key Terms<\/strong><\/td> Definitions<\/strong><\/td><\/tr> Binary Opposition<\/td> a pair of related terms or concepts that appear to be opposite in meaning (e.g. light\/dark, good\/evil, masculine\/feminine)<\/td><\/tr> Privileged Term<\/td> the preferred term of a binary opposition; the term\u2019s connotation usually creates its privileged status<\/td><\/tr> Suppressed Term<\/td> the unfavorable term of a binary opposition; the term\u2019s connotation usually creates its unfavorable status<\/td><\/tr> Hierarchies<\/td> a system in which ideas, objects, people, groups, and institutions are ranked one above the other according to privileged status or authority<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDeconstruction, a theory that arose from post-structuralism, asserts that since systems are always changing, it is impossible to describe a complete system. Deconstructive criticism also explores patterns within texts, but deconstructive criticism aims to demonstrate how conflicting forces within the text undermine the stability of the text\u2019s structure, revealing meaning as an array of undetermined possibilities. Deconstructive criticism may also focus on binaries in a text, such as good\/evil, light\/dark, male\/female, poor\/rich, linear\/nonlinear, old\/young, masculine\/feminine, or natural\/artificial, to expose one aspect of the binary as privileged and the other as suppressed. <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n Foundational Questions of Post-Structuralist, Deconstructive Criticism<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n