{"id":2269,"date":"2019-09-12T21:33:35","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T21:33:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/transfer.writingcommons.org\/?page_id=2269"},"modified":"2023-12-21T11:34:03","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T11:34:03","slug":"21st-century-literacies-cognitive-intrapersonal-and-interpersonal-competencies","status":"publish","type":"section","link":"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/section\/literacy\/21st-century-literacies-cognitive-intrapersonal-and-interpersonal-competencies\/","title":{"rendered":"Cognitive, Intrapersonal, and Interpersonal Competencies"},"content":{"rendered":"
Cognitive, intrapersonal, <\/em>and interpersonal competencies<\/em>, according to learning scientists,<\/p>\n\n\n\n From this perspective, a writer’s<\/a> cognitive, intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies determine how well a writer thinks and communicates with others. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Synonyms: 21st century literacy; Workforce Competency; Deeper Learning<\/p>\n\n\n\n Literacy, as defined by the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) community is an amalgam of many competencies, skills, knowledge, and dispositions.<\/p>\n\n\n In Education for Life<\/em> and Work<\/a> (2012), The National Academies of Sciences theorizes that human thinking and communication are made possible by a cluster of three core competencies. <\/p>\n\n\n\n These competencies are composed of multiple, interdependent clusters of competencies. Competencies coalesce to form clusters of competencies that people access when confronted with particular rhetorical situations<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Academy views cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal competencies to be deeply interrelated and interdependent. In the illustration below, note the Academy places reasoning\/argumentation and communication at the heart of their literacy construct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Perhaps most importantly, the Academy views cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal competencies to be dynamic properties (as opposed to static, fixed traits) that evolve as we develop as individuals, face new rhetorical situations<\/a>, and engage in deeper learning and literacy practices<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n\n\n<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
\n
\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nCognitive<\/td> Intrapersonal<\/td> Interpersonal<\/td><\/tr> Argumentation
Creativity
Critical Thinking
Innovation
Knowledge
Reasoning
<\/td>Appreciation for Diversity
Conscientiousness
Flexibility
Initiative
Intellectual Openness
Metacognition
Positive Core Self-Evaluation
Teamwork & Collaboration
Leadership<\/td>Intellectual Openness
Work Ethic
Positive Self Evaluation<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n